uk en
Home Projects News Analysts Contacts
uk en
Subscribe
Mainpage

>

Team

>

Svitlana Hordiienko
alt

Svitlana Hordiienko

lawyer-analyst

hordiienko.sk@gmail.com

2022 рік - Бакалавр права - Національний юридичний університет імені Ярослава Мудрого
2024 рік - Магістр права - Український католицький університет

Напрями роботи в ІЗІ: моніторинг АРМА, конфіскація російських активів та управління санкційними активами, наповнення Конфіскаційного трекера інформацією про заморожені російські активи закордоном, санкційні режими та ухилення від санкцій.

Related analysts

Analysis of the impact of sanctions on the operations of extractive companies
Analysis of the impact of sanctions on the operations of extractive companies
A study on blocked subsoil enterprises with detailed performance indicators

Authors:

Andriy Klymosyuk, Svitlana Hordiienko, Tetiana Khutor, Artem Panchenko, Taras Riabchenko,
15 April 2024
Read more

Докладніше

Efficient reparations now

Останнє оновлення: 18 Nov. 2024

The Institute of Legislative Ideas develops and promotes tools for effective compensation for the damage caused by Russia's war against Ukraine. The project covers accounting for losses, searching for sources of compensation and monitoring the use of funds

Докладніше

Minimizing corruption risks in public policy

Останнє оновлення: 18 Nov. 2024

The project includes anti-corruption expertise of legislation, strategic assessment of corruption risks in the sectors, confiscation of unjustified assets, management of corrupt assets, return of corrupt assets to Ukraine, and monitoring of Ukraine's anti-corruption obligations.

Докладніше

Monitoring the implementation of the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC)

Останнє оновлення: 18 Nov. 2024

The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) is the only universal legally binding instrument to fight corruption in the world. UNCAC obliges state parties to implement effective anti-corruption mechanisms. The monitoring of the Convention's implementation is based on mutual evaluation by the states parties. It involves each state being reviewed by two other states. The process is divided into two five-year cycles. During the first cycle, the implementation of the provisions of Chapters III and IV is evaluated, and during the second cycle, Chapters II and V are evaluated.