The Risks of Draft Law №12406 and Recommendations for Alignment with the Best International Standards and EU Requirements

Publisher: Think Tank “Institute of Legislative Ideas”. All rights reserved. 

Executive Summary

Draft law No. 12406, which provides for the criminalisation of sanctions violations and circumvention, is a critically important document for Ukraine, designed to ensure compliance of national legislation with EU requirements, in particular Directive (EU) 2024/1226, and to strengthen the fight against sanctions violators. However, the changes made during the preparation for the second reading create three key risks: 

  1. Non-alignment with EU requirements – limiting liability to intentional violations only is contrary to Directive (EU) 2024/1226, which requires the criminalisation of negligent violations as well.
  2. Risk of sanctions circumvention – an insufficiently clear exemption mechanism for legal services could create a loophole for asset withdrawal.
  3. Human rights violations – the lack of a mechanism for providing licences to carry out actions prohibited by sanctions may lead to blocked access to medical, educational and other essential services.

To ensure the effectiveness of the draft law, it is necessary to: provide for criminal liability for negligent violations, clarify restrictions on legal fees, and introduce a system for providing licences to carry out actions prohibited by sanctions.

Incorporating these recommendations will enable Ukraine to establish an effective system for countering sanctions violations that adheres to the best international practices.

Introduction

Sanctions are one of the most important tools for countering individuals whose behaviour threatens national security and international legal order. Since the start of full-scale aggression, through the joint efforts of the sanctions coalition countries and the civil society, Russia has become the most sanctioned country in the world.  Moreover, sanctions have become a powerful tool capable of significantly weakening the aggressor’s ability to wage war and depriving its accomplices of the opportunity to lead a carefree lifestyle.

However, it is important not only to impose sanctions, but also to ensure compliance with them and to hold violators accountable. For this purpose, the legislation of a significant number of countries contains provisions on liability for sanctions violations and circumvention. Some international associations have gone even further, creating minimum standards for the criminalisation of such acts.  For example, in order to overcome the fragmentation of the system for ensuring the sanctions effectiveness, the European Union adopted Directive 2024/1226, which establishes minimum standards for the criminal prosecution of sanctions violators. EU Member States had to implement the corresponding provisions into national legislation by 20 May 2025. As a candidate country for EU membership, Ukraine is obliged to bring its national legislation into line with EU law, in particular Directive 2024/1226. This follows from both Article 7 of the Association Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine and the recommendations of the European Commission provided in its reports on Ukraine’s progress within the EU Enlargement Package. In particular, in its 2024 Report, the European Commission emphasised the necessity of amending the Criminal Code by the introduction of a new article criminalising circumvention of restrictive measures, as sanctions evasion is still not a criminal offence in Ukraine. 

Development of the draft law on criminalisation of sanctions violations and circumvention

With the aim of strengthening Ukraine’s national security and fulfilling its European integration commitments, an interdepartmental working group coordinated by the think tank “Institute of Legislative Ideas”, together with the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine and with the participation of more than 10 representatives of other state agencies and bodies, spent more than a year developing a draft law on the criminalisation of sanctions violations and circumvention. As a result, on 14 January 2025, the President of Ukraine submitted to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine a draft law “On Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine “On Sanctions” to establish liability for violation of special economic and other restrictive measures (sanctions)” (hereinafter referred to as draft law No. 12406). 

On 3 June 2025, draft law No. 12406 on the criminalisation of sanctions violations and circumvention was adopted as a basis by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. This document has become an important foundation for reforming Ukraine’s sanctions policy and creating a legal framework for effectively combating sanctions violations. With targeted improvements, it will be able to incorporate the requirements of the recently adopted Directive (EU) 2024/1226 and international best practices. The draft law is currently being prepared for voting in the second reading.

Current version of the draft law and identified shortcomings

On 9 July 2025, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Law Enforcement approved the draft law No. 12406 for the second reading. In general, most of the amendments supported by MPs improve the quality of the draft law, while a number of provisions were introduced that moved away from achieving this objective, worsened its quality and reduced the prospects for its effectiveness.

The think tank  “Institute of Legislative Ideas” has analysed the comparative table of amendments supported by the Committee and emphasises the most significant shortcomings that should be eliminated to preserve the logic of the law, ensure compliance with EU requirements and align with the best international practices.

І. Limitation of criminal liability to intentional violations only

Liability is established only for intentional failure to comply with or obstruction of the sanctions, whereas the previous version provided for liability also for negligent sanctions violations. 

Directive (EU) 2024/1226, Article 3 (3), clearly states that “Member States shall ensure that the conduct listed in paragraph 1, point (e) of this Article, constitutes a criminal offence also if committed with serious negligence…”, and recital 4 of the preamble states “Certain conduct should constitute a criminal offence also if carried out with serious negligence”.

Thus, the proposed approach would directly contradict the EU Directive.

The Council of Europe experts, in their conclusions on the draft law for the first reading, positively evaluated Ukraine’s efforts to criminalise negligent violations as well.

Furthermore, the absence of criminal liability for negligent sanctions violations will significantly complicate the process of proving violations and will make Ukrainian legislation one of the weakest among the sanctions coalition countries. For instance, negligence is criminalised in Germany, Austria, Sweden, Denmark, Croatia, Norway, and Switzerland. Recently, Lithuania, in implementing the Directive, also established liability for negligent violations.

Therefore, we propose establishing liability for both intentional and negligent sanctions violations by removing the qualifying word “intentional” from the provision. The absence of such specification would mean criminalisation of sanctions violations irrespective of the form of culpability.

ІІ. Creating a “loophole” for the withdrawal of assets of sanctioned persons with the help of lawyers

It is proposed to supplement the Law of Ukraine “On Sanctions” with an “exception” from sanctions, which will apply to the conclusion and execution of a contract for the provision of legal assistance with a sanctioned person, while the payment procedure for such services and the method of calculating the amount of remuneration for lawyers will be established at the sub-legislative level. Overall, such changes are necessary in the context of ensuring the right of individuals to professional legal assistance, but it should be explicitly specified that the “exception” applies only to services that correspond to the legally defined amount of remuneration. If the legal fee exceeds this amount, it should be classified as a sanction violation.

ІІІ. Absence of a mechanism for providing licences to carry out actions prohibited by sanctions

The proposed version of the draft law lacks the possibility of obtaining a licence to carry out actions that are prohibited by sanctions.

The lack of a licensing system was explicitly mentioned during the last screening of legislation for compliance with the EU acquis. Therefore, Ukraine should establish such a licensing system similar to those already in place in the EU, the US, the UK and other sanctions coalition countries.

Without such a provision, criminalisation leads to violations of fundamental human rights (e.g., inability to obtain medical care, payment for educational services, etc.), reputational damage to Ukraine, and multimillion-dollar compensation payments in the future as a result of complaints to the European Court of Human Rights, and the law itself risks being declared unconstitutional. 

Regulating the procedure for providing licences with open information about applicants and licences issued will make the state sanctions policy predictable, transparent and flexible. This will contribute to the protection of national security and, at the same time, enable a rapid response to economic challenges and needs.

Conclusions and recommendations

Draft law No. 12406 is an important step in developing an effective system for countering sanctions violations in Ukraine. Despite significant progress achieved during the drafting and adoption at first reading, changes made during the preparation for the second reading create risks of inconsistency with international standards and reduced effectiveness of law enforcement.

In light of these risks, the think tank “Institute of Legislative Ideas” considers it critically important to incorporate the following changes before voting in the second reading:

  1. Ensure compliance with Directive (EU) 2024/1226 by including  criminal liability for negligent sanctions violations;
  2. Clarify the mechanism for legal aid exemptions to prevent the withdrawal of assets of sanctioned individuals through lawyers;
  3. Introduce a mechanism for providing licences to carry out actions prohibited by sanctions that may be justified by humanitarian, medical or other objective needs.

Successful implementation of these changes will enable Ukraine not only to fulfil its European integration commitments, but also to establish an effective system for countering sanctions violations, that will align with the best practices of the sanctions coalition countries and will contribute to further increasing pressure on the aggressor and its accomplices.