By compiling data from these three institutions, we were able to identify 83 draft laws that have been analyzed using the instruments of anti-corruption expertise by all three of those bodies. The results showed uneven detection of corruption factors in the draft laws:
· 79.6% (67 out of 83) of the analyzed draft laws received no recommendations from any institution. 66 of them received positive opinions from the Ministry of Justice and the Verkhovna Rada Committee, while NAPC did not give its opinion.
· 16 draft laws (20.4%) received comments with reservations (on corruptogenic factors or other reservations about the non-compliance with anti-corruption legislation). In 10 of them, only the Committee identified the risks; in 1 – only NAPC, in 1 more – only the Ministry of Justice.
Basing out analysis on not only quantitative indicators or their comparison, we studied the systemic (internal) problems and complications that impede the effective implementation of anti-corruption expertise by each body.
In addition to the analysis of the regulations of these institutions, we conducted 6 anonymous interviews with persons who work / worked in each of them and were directly involved in the implementation of anti-corruption expertise (those interviews were conducted not only with representatives of management, but also with ordinary employees).